Having watched the first two Transporter films, I approached Transporter 3 with a mix of excitement and trepidation. I had heard whispers that this installment wasn’t quite up to par with its predecessors, a sentiment that often precedes the third film in a trilogy. However, diving into Transporter 3, I found myself thoroughly entertained and, dare I say, pleasantly surprised by Frank Martin’s latest mission.
Perhaps my expectations were set low, but Transporter 3 delivered the high-octane action and classic Jason Statham performance that fans of the series crave. This time, the action shifts back to the European landscape, and Frank is tasked with transporting another “package.” But this delivery comes with a dangerous twist that significantly raises the stakes: an explosive device strapped to his wrist, mirroring one attached to his cargo. This ingenious plot device immediately grabs your attention. The established dangers of Frank’s profession are amplified as he must constantly remain within a certain radius of his vehicle to avoid detonation. It’s a clever way to maintain suspense throughout the film, creating moments where you genuinely think, “Oh sh*t, the bomb!” adding a unique layer to the typical Transporter formula.
Jason Statham as Frank Martin in Transporter 3, highlighting the explosive wristband plot device.
Beyond the explosive premise, another key aspect of Transporter 3 is Frank’s interaction with his “package,” Valentina, played by Natalya Rudakova. Their dynamic, in some ways, echoes Frank’s relationship with Lai from the original Transporter. Valentina’s headstrong personality and reckless actions frequently test Frank’s renowned patience, a prime example being her drug use right before a crucial car chase. However, a point of contention for me, and perhaps for other viewers, is the speed at which Frank and Valentina’s relationship evolves. While I understand the need for character development within the film’s timeframe, the romantic turn feels somewhat rushed and unconvincing. Despite this, it doesn’t detract significantly from the overall enjoyment of the movie, which is undeniably action-packed and engaging.
One element of Transporter 3 that pushes the boundaries of believability, even for an action film, is the depiction of Frank’s automotive feats. While I appreciate the creative and over-the-top action sequences, some stunts strain credulity. For instance, the idea of restarting a car immediately after it has been submerged in a lake seems highly improbable. Similarly, the scene involving a car landing on a moving train stretches the limits of plausibility. I acknowledge that cinematic license is a staple of action movies, but these particular moments felt a bit too far-fetched and momentarily took me out of the immersive experience.
Despite these minor shortcomings, Transporter 3 remains a solid entry in the Transporter series. Even after more than a decade since its release, Jason Statham’s portrayal of Frank Martin is as compelling as ever. Let’s collectively pretend the reboot never happened and hope for Statham to reprise his role in the future. What are your thoughts on the Transporter 3 movie? Share your opinions in the comments below!
See also:
My Thoughts on: Transporter 2 (2005)
My Thoughts on: The Transporter (2002)
Film Reviews
Become a Patron of the blog at patreon.com/musicgamer460
Check out the YouTube channel (and consider hitting the subscribe button)
Don’t forget to like Film Music Central on Facebook
Share this Post
Like Loading…
